I just needed to add a few more notes to this at 5:14pm, after I've had time to feel the reaction to it. So, who's 'pissed off' at me? The president? At little old me? I'm standing here at the library all by myself on the express computer. Am I a threat? How would I know I was a threat to such an important person? But is he going to hold it against me anyway, like George W. Bush did? I hope not.
When someone comes to me to tell me about something they saw on the news, they never tell me what they think about it. It's clear to me that they never analyze the stories being presented to them, but just accept them as fact. I'd want to know why they chose this particular story for broadcasting and not something else in its place, but they seem to think that nothing happens except what they see on the news. What about your own lives? Do you not exist because you're not on the news?
And why do we have such a sexual hang up in our culture when it comes to under-aged partners? Didn't Samuel de Champlain marry a girl of thirteen? That's what it said in my history text book in elementary school. How many girls in my class read it along with me? Was Samuel de Champlain a sex offender then? I'm confused. Why was fourteen old enough back then and not old enough now? And why would a fourteen-year-old be attracted to an old man like Bill Cosby? Could it be because he's a star? And who made him a star in the eyes of all these young fans? Maybe they should share in the blame for his crime now instead of pointing fingers at him.
December 2018:
The present:
Do you think you're a good parent? So did my parents when they brought me into this corrupt shithole of a crime culture. They believed some of the lies that were said about me on the news to support the massive fraud with my music and comedy and figured they were innocent. But maybe they should be held responsible for watching such a nasty spectacle and believing it was true. It's funny how everyone thinks the TV is there for them. It's not there for you; it's there for corrupt, rich assholes who want to manipulate you. Can you buy a transmitter and set up your own national network? Probably not. But if you did, would you let them say anything that you disagreed with, no matter how truthful? I doubt it. So the only way to have a fair broadcasting system is to give everyone their own networks, and that will never happen. Instead, we will always have an unfair broadcasting system to poison our hearts and minds and lead us all to self betrayal.
When I talk about manipulation, I mean when they stray from the root of a logical argument to make some appeal to your irrational subconscious. Say they don't like a liberal government policy. The proper thing for them to do would be to criticize that policy and expose its weakness with a logical argument. But they'd rather not get you thinking, like I always try to do. That scares them. So if they don't want a liberal prime minister, instead of criticizing his policies, they attack his image. They want you to vote like dumb animals who react negatively to certain images, like a bull who's had a red cape tossed in its face. And then they want you to thank them for helping you with your choice.
The media has totally ruined my life. From the day they lied and said I went to jail for their own stars' crimes, they ruined my life. That was twelve years ago. And every day since has been a struggle for me against their destruction. It's a struggle I face alone because there are no lawyers for their victims. Believe me, I've tried. There are no lawyers in the world for victims of a corrupt media that lies about who writes music and comedy. But there are plenty of lawyers for the pricks who commit the fraud.
I'd like to make a video to discuss each and every song that they stole from me and presented to you as fraud on their crimecast, but YouTube has no room for ten-hour videos and I would need ten hours for the music alone before I even start the discussion. But ten hours of music is an enormous chunk of my life that these assholes want to punish me with when all it did was give rock fans pleasure. You're supposed to reap what you sow in this world, and I sowed love with my web posts from 1999 to 2007. I sowed love, but these corrupt broadcasters made sure that I reaped hate for sowing love. And it's a bit much for me to see how they hack my account to pieces all the time to cover up their shitty trail, as I discovered last year in the video above. And here are some of the words that accompanied the post here on Blogger: Hey, I just tried to visit my YouTube dashboard and ended up in that 'studio.youtube' bullshit page again. Have they not fixed that yet? I tried typing in the URL of my youtube studio: www.youtube.com/dashboard and it sent me to this URL. Did YouTube move my videos to a new URL? How do I get back to the original URL? (I checked. No, they didn't.) 1 to 30 of about 108? I have over 300 videos on YouTube. Why can't I GET INTO MY ORIGINAL URL FOR MY YOUTUBE VIDEOS? And now I have almost 400 videos. What does it say on your bullshit page instead?
I probably say this every election, but the corporate media should not be allowed to make their own warped qualitative assessments of election candidates. It has too much influence on the public. The media should be limited to names, dates, and campaign issues - nothing more. We're having an election here.
Now, about thirty-five years ago, someone gave me this brown face paint for a joke and I put it on for Halloween. Was I being a racist? I was just curious to see how strange I would look. I noticed that it made my mother's green eyes stand out a lot more. Then I went to try it out on the neighbours, and one of them said, 'you look like a green-eyed Packie.' Did that make me a racist? I thought it made him a racist. Anyway, I wiped it off shortly after. So much for that experiment. And if I wanted to run for prime minister thirty-five years later, I wouldn't expect it to hold me back. But this seems to be some sort of terrible scandal for our prime minister. Is that all they can dig up against him? He must have an exceptionally clean background.
They certainly are trying to destroy his chances of reelection. Why? Did he forget to offer them some special reward for their support? He wouldn't need their support if they were forbidden to make qualitative assessments of our politicians. As long as things are like this, you can only trust the candidates who are obviously not receiving media support.
But if you want to know who they speak highly of, look at all the names on my copyright offenders list. They told you these assholes were 'sweet' or 'funny'. They even called one of them Jesus Christ. That's how they speak of monsters who steal music and comedy from artists and lie to the world for profit. And they never own up to it, as long as their victim is still alive. So it follows that anyone they speak ill of is probably a decent person.
And do you actually want news from them? Or do you want smut? I'll tell you a news story that was big when the Democrats held office: real estate scams tricked thousands of Americans out of their homes. So, someone high up in real estate would have made a huge fortune off of that. Who was high up in real estate at the time? Oh, the president? Right, no scandal there. But let's all look at thirty-five-year-old pictures of the P.M. putting on face paint for a party. What a monster.
No comments:
Post a Comment